Monday, February 05, 2007

Teaching. A Parable.

Imagine taking a course at a university where the professor lectured once a week for an hour on a topic of his choosing. There was no syllabus, just an enormous, ancient textbook written in multiple dead languages that was at times confusing and extremely difficult to comprehend. Everyone was expected to read the book and get familiar with its contents so the lectures would make more sense. The lectures, predictably, were given with the intent to explain the textbook in greater detail and then prepare the students for future tests.

However, there were several difficulties that were not explained at the outset of the class. First of all, the tests were given at random and on an individual basis. Also, they generally did not relate to the previous lecture and in some cases to any lecture given up to that point. Often the lectures did not follow any particular pattern, but when they did, only a small percentage of people in the class were tested on that specific material. The professor’s intent was for the class to be discussing his lectures and the textbook through the week at various times, but that usually did not happen. Sometimes a few people from the class would gather for a study group at one of their homes, but they usually didn’t talk about the professor’s lectures. The generally accepted practice would be for one of the students to take it upon themselves to come up with their own lecture from the textbook and they would discuss that portion.

Some dutifully took notes on the lectures week after week, but became frustrated when they kept failing tests in spite of their diligence. After all, the tests were unpredictable and sometimes dealt with highly specific and advanced material – graduate level work perhaps. These diligent ones tried to study the textbook for themselves and occasionally had a little more success. But others got so wrapped up in their own studies that they began to miss classes and even ignored the tests.

The majority of the students did not take notes or even read the textbook. Most of them were failing tests, or like the self-studiers, missing the tests altogether, but they still came to class week after week to listen to the lectures. The professor, who noticed that his students were struggling on the tests, decided that he probably needed to open another lecture during the week for deeper and further explanation of the textbook. Some of the more conscientious students came to those lectures and added more notes to their notebooks. But the tests kept coming.

The professor decided to open up office hours for his students to come and discuss the material more in depth and to answer specific questions. Some came and took advantage of this opportunity and were able to talk to the professor about why they were failing tests and what they could do to improve. However, others came because the professor was a nice man and would listen to their problems. Pretty soon, the professor had a full schedule of students coming to listen to his advice about anything they felt uncomfortable with about school. The professor would try to help them all, but it was very difficult to give each person exactly what they wanted. Many came back to his office week after week with the same problem, but he had so many people to see that it was impossible to spend the time necessary to help the really hard cases. After a while, the professor was so busy that the people who were coming for help on the tests couldn’t even schedule a meeting with him anymore.

Eventually, many of the students began to drop the class. They had found another class where the professor’s lectures were much more interesting and more people were signing up to take his classes. They found out quickly that the professor used the same textbook, the tests were still random and difficult, and he was just as busy as the last professor. But he was a much more engaging speaker and appeared to be in tune with their problems at school. Many of the students decided that this just must be what college life is all about – find a good professor to listen to, take good notes, and try to get lucky on a test once in a while.

6 Comments:

Blogger Chriseric said...

This is why there is a holy mandate for the leaders who can discern this not be trapped into being a source. The tender lambs who are God's people must be taught about the true internal Guide, the Divine Occupant, and how to engage that Teacher which leads the soul to experience the truth and the wisdom-riches of the Kingdom within. Then so many could be saved from being turned again from looking to man and the repititions of former second-hand experience which erects merely forms without power and drives the ships of faith onto the rocks.

11:51 PM  
Blogger steven hamilton said...

i know you're going quote Jesus and say from Mark 4: 'Then Jesus said to them, "Don't you understand this parable? How then will you understand any parable?'
;-)

But is this parable just about church or about church and life...or the melding of both?

i think obviously the lecturing teacher is a pastor in somewhat of a traditional (at least in America) church setting, who "preaches/teaches" a little while one day a week. the tests come as the students go live their lives...

anyway, i say the lecturer should go out with the students and either add a practicum to his lectures...wait...but yet again, in this setting perhaps there were just too many students for the lecturer to give individual attention even during a practicum...thus he might be overwhelmed by more and more practicums and the needed lectures might get neglected...

ah ha! so, what he needs is like what any good professor needs: a bunch of graduate students!! he can do the practicum with them and then they can take over most of his practicum load...right, right?

7:50 AM  
Blogger steven hamilton said...

i forgot to add my own quote from horseshack: "O...O, mr. kotter, mr. kotter." with hand-raised...

;)

9:51 AM  
Blogger Tim said...

not much arguing with the parable really. The model is broken. I completely agree.

I would ask, however, that you share a parable of a model that does better. I'm beginning to think that the problem goes much deeper than our models. I think a (not "the", "a") root of the problem is in our western individualistic culture. And if that's the case, than transformation is our only hope, whichever model we live in.

for what it's worth...

3:32 PM  
Blogger Mike said...

Steven,

I like the thought of "graduate students". Not as students of the professor necessarily...(maybe one subtext of the parable is questioning the whole system of having a talking-head professor in the first place), but as students of the subject matter and those who can help others navigate the "tests".

Tim, I don't know if I have a parable for a model that does better. I have seen glimpses of "better" in some unexpected places though. For example, I think the church could learn much from studying the work of Maria Montessori and her research with early childhood education. Another place is in the values and practices of Alcoholics Anonymous. Lots of good stuff in there if you dig a little.

8:55 PM  
Blogger Tim said...

good thoughts. Having worked extensively with AA guys in my last job, I can say that's dead on. Lots of transferable stuff, not the least of which is a culture that values honesty and real-ness over fakeness and hidden shame.

All that said I'm hoping that someday 'the church' will figure this out. I'll be honest, the last thing I feel that I need is another three-point sermon on how to fix my brokenness (with all the subpoints starting with "p") - and yet I know some incredibly broken people who are there and I'm glad that they are part of a church that can help them along on their journey- hopefully they won't be stunted. If they are truly helped I have to believe that at some point they will be ready to join up in life-changing community, relational, honest, and transforming. shame-free. So the question is really, can 'the church' really help people do that?

I used to say "no" - but now I say maybe.

12:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home