Wednesday, November 08, 2006

What is Church?


While flipping through Wright's "Jesus and the Victory of God" tonight, I ran across this quote I had underlined:

"Jesus...envisaged that, scattered around Palestine, there would be small groups of people loyal to himself, who would get together to encourage one another, and would act as members of a family, sharing some sort of common life and, in particular, exercising mutual forgiveness. It was because this way of life was what it was, while reflecting the theology it did, that Jesus' whole movement was thoroughly, and dangerously, 'political'. And...the main characteristic of the cells that Jesus called into being was of course loyalty to Jesus himself."

There are several things in this quote that stand out to me. First, if you were to nail me to the wall and make me answer the question, "What is church?" right now, my answer would probably sound very similar to what Wright describes above:

- "Small groups of people loyal to himself..." Small not because small is "better" in some arbitrary way, but small as in nimble. Unencumbered. A minority. Small groups of people can live and enact change without a lot of fanfare or organization. This is important for what the rest of the quote describes.

- "...who would get together to encourage one another..." Encouragement. "One-anothering". People undergoing transition cannot survive alone. We need the proximity of others who are changing as we are changing. Attending a conference and hearing a cool speaker or meeting a few people who live hundreds of miles away is not enough. Internet / phone relationships are not enough. Transition requires flesh and blood, day in day out connection. You can argue with me all you want about online community, but sorry, it just will not substitute for the kind of relationship necessary during transition.

- "...and would act as members of a family..." Like it or not, church, the "gathered ones", constitutes a family. Families take care of one another. Families don't give up on each other when someone pulls a Ted Haggard. Families don't just work together or relate to each other because they like the same things. They are blood, and blood sticks together.

- "...sharing some kind of common life..." Notice Wright says they shared "some kind" of common life. Jesus didn't appear to be too concerned about the nuts and bolts, just that his disciples were together in whatever they did. Obviously, when Christian communities began to form after the resurrection, they didn't all look exactly the same. I think Jesus expected this, but he also expected that his followers would live in a way that challenged the status quo. Hence, the next portion of the quote...

- "...in particular, exercising mutual forgiveness." Forgiveness, along with friendship, are probably two of the most underappreciated and dismissed practices in our culture. Yet, for the apprentice of Jesus, they are in some cases the only real weapons we have in destroying evil. We challenge our children to forgive when a bully at school makes fun of them, but when another adult challenges our autonomy, we strike back with violence. Imagine if we saw and practiced forgiveness for what it really is in the kingdom - a subversive battle axe of the Spirit.

- "...and the main characteristic...was loyalty to Jesus himself." We love each other as family, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers, but our loyalty belongs to Jesus. We relate to one another on that basis alone. If our loyalties lie in institutions or with leaders, what happens when those institutions or leaders fail us or hurt us? If our loyalty is with Jesus, we are free to forgive those that harm us and then move forward with what God is doing.

Wright mentions how this vision of Jesus was "dangerously political". In light of the politics of our time, I think the same could be true of groups of people who strive to follow this vision now. The kingdom of God is fundamentally about God's will and authority. Those who have given themselves over to that authority run the risk of challenging the other "authorities" present in this world. All the more reason, that if you aim to live as an apprentice of the Master, you better do it with some others who are doing the same.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't disagree, per se, at all with his description, but I do find myself wondering what he bases it on, precisely.

Any ideas? I don't want to require you to write a book in response, but I'm not sure exactly how Wright can say this was Jesus's vision.

Brant

3:47 PM  
Blogger Mike said...

Shortest answer: Read the book.

Short answer: It has something to do with parallels he draws with other apocalyptic communities of the time - specifically the Essenes and John the Baptist's followers for example. It was also the way he dealt with his disciples directly. Something like that.

I'll show you the context for the quote in the book tonight at dinner. Everyone else will have to wait until I can read it again.

3:55 PM  
Blogger Bill Bean said...

I wonder if Jesus assumed many would continue in the temple and synagogue. Did he indicate that participation on those aspects of common life would cease?

5:40 PM  
Blogger Douglas_Coombs said...

"We love each other as family, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers, but our loyalty belongs to Jesus. We relate to one another on that basis alone. If our loyalties lie in institutions or with leaders, what happens when those institutions or leaders fail us or hurt us?"

It is surely true that God alone is worthy of our deepest loyalty, but can't we have loyalty to both God and _____? I would think that a loyalty to and love for God would be expressed in a loyalty to others. For instance, if my kids fail me, I still owe them my loyalty. If my wife fails me, I still owe her my loyalty. If my brothers and sisters in Christ fail me, I still owe them my loyalty. If my church leaders fail me, I still owe them my loyalty. (Mat. 23:2-3, Acts 23:5)

Perhaps we are defining loyalty differently. I don't understand where you are coming from on this one.

Doug

8:49 PM  
Blogger Douglas_Coombs said...

BTW: I found "the writings" on the main website the other day. Interesting stuff.

Doug

8:53 PM  
Blogger Mike said...

Bill, that's a good question. The early Christians in Jerusalem kept going to the temple for a while. But, it was pretty clear that Jesus placed judgment on the temple and prophesied its destruction. So...he probably figured they'd stop going once the Romans destroyed it.

Doug...I'm referring to loyalty in the same context I think Wright is describing it in this quote in reference to Jesus' followers. Maybe a good definition would be allegience? It's not just faithfulness or respect...we certainly should give that to our families and other institutions we're a part of. "Loyalty to Jesus himself" implies a singular focus. Not to ignore other godly loyalties, but to recognize that those cannot trump our allegience to Jesus.

10:48 PM  
Blogger Douglas_Coombs said...

Mike,

Thanks for the clarification. That makes more sense.

Doug

11:49 PM  
Anonymous steven hamilton said...

i think the loyalty he describes also reflects what we see in the hebrew scriptures - hesed. covenant loyalty. like you said Mike, we are family now, which in ancient times those not related came into a kinship-relationship through covenant...this just happens to be the New Covenant cut with the very Blood of Jesus. Jesus is what brings us into the loyalty-kinship relationship...and spurs us on to be a part of this counter-cultural, forgiving community...and loyalty to Jesus is loyalty to our family...whether the rest of the family recognizes it or not, i guess

9:30 AM  
Blogger Marsh said...

man, i have that book on the bookshelf and haven't touched it in a long time. your killing me, Bishop, now I have to read it!!

4:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home