A Side Note on Authority
Before I move on to the next role in a renewed vision for five-fold ministry, I thought I'd take a slight detour and address something that came up in the comments of the previous two posts. The issue of authority came up, namely if you don't have one dude in charge somewhere along the line, what happens to aspects of these roles such as church discipline, doctrinal faithfulness, and obedience to a particular way of life? It's a good question and one I won't even come close to answering adequately in this post.
First of all, I appreciate the perspective of the person who brought it up who is a Catholic convert (Doug Coombs in the comments below). I certainly understand the argument that authority and obedience in spiritual matters is a tough pill to swallow in our culture. The god of autonomy is not something to be taken lightly. However, I wonder about the necessity of creating hierarchies of power in order for spiritual authority to operate the way God intends. Can spiritual authority operate among a group of people who are first and foremost committed to apprenticeship to Jesus and caring for one another without artificially constructed hierarchies? I believe it can. Abuses most often occur (both in Protestant and Catholic settings) when authority is assumed because of position and title and the Spirit is left out of the equation. This has happened in the church for a very long time.
Here's a example of how spiritual authority and the pastoral gift in a group context might work in the way I've been describing. A few years ago, a man in our church had an affair and was found out by his wife. We all were very close to this family and they were a integral part of our community. Myself and a few others counseled both him and his wife through the first few days and then we had our normal weekly worship gathering. I was quite unsure how the gathering would go or even if we should invite the family to come. Since we were a very small group, this event was devastating to everyone and had the potential to either draw us together or tear us apart. After receiving some counsel from some friends older and wiser than me, we decided to invite the couple to come. At the gathering, the community expressed a wide range of responses - anger, sadness, grief, but also joy that the truth had finally come out. There was great love expressed for the man and his family, but a recognition that his situation was grim if he did not turn away from the patterns he had developed.
In the end, the man did change and their marriage was saved. His choice to turn around his life was impacted greatly by the spiritual authority the group expressed, not by someone holding a title. A tremendous amount of authority resides in a group of people who have agreed to a certain direction or course of life. My research into Alcoholics Anonymous confirms how this is possible.
Hierarchies exist. No one can deny that or even their necessity to make things "go" in life. In the church, people exercise leadership gifts to make things "go". Sometimes they even need to rattle cages a little to stir a sleeping bride. It's easy to recognize these people and generally they are the type who just naturally lead like they eat, sleep, and walk. Within a community of faith, from time to time God needs to use an individual or a few to help the community navigate through a trial or difficult question. But it is my sincere belief that the Holy Spirit is perfectly capable of coordinating that leadership without our help. Rather, we should focus our attention towards "the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love."
Authority expressed by the Spirit through a community committed to maturity in Christ.
First of all, I appreciate the perspective of the person who brought it up who is a Catholic convert (Doug Coombs in the comments below). I certainly understand the argument that authority and obedience in spiritual matters is a tough pill to swallow in our culture. The god of autonomy is not something to be taken lightly. However, I wonder about the necessity of creating hierarchies of power in order for spiritual authority to operate the way God intends. Can spiritual authority operate among a group of people who are first and foremost committed to apprenticeship to Jesus and caring for one another without artificially constructed hierarchies? I believe it can. Abuses most often occur (both in Protestant and Catholic settings) when authority is assumed because of position and title and the Spirit is left out of the equation. This has happened in the church for a very long time.
Here's a example of how spiritual authority and the pastoral gift in a group context might work in the way I've been describing. A few years ago, a man in our church had an affair and was found out by his wife. We all were very close to this family and they were a integral part of our community. Myself and a few others counseled both him and his wife through the first few days and then we had our normal weekly worship gathering. I was quite unsure how the gathering would go or even if we should invite the family to come. Since we were a very small group, this event was devastating to everyone and had the potential to either draw us together or tear us apart. After receiving some counsel from some friends older and wiser than me, we decided to invite the couple to come. At the gathering, the community expressed a wide range of responses - anger, sadness, grief, but also joy that the truth had finally come out. There was great love expressed for the man and his family, but a recognition that his situation was grim if he did not turn away from the patterns he had developed.
In the end, the man did change and their marriage was saved. His choice to turn around his life was impacted greatly by the spiritual authority the group expressed, not by someone holding a title. A tremendous amount of authority resides in a group of people who have agreed to a certain direction or course of life. My research into Alcoholics Anonymous confirms how this is possible.
Hierarchies exist. No one can deny that or even their necessity to make things "go" in life. In the church, people exercise leadership gifts to make things "go". Sometimes they even need to rattle cages a little to stir a sleeping bride. It's easy to recognize these people and generally they are the type who just naturally lead like they eat, sleep, and walk. Within a community of faith, from time to time God needs to use an individual or a few to help the community navigate through a trial or difficult question. But it is my sincere belief that the Holy Spirit is perfectly capable of coordinating that leadership without our help. Rather, we should focus our attention towards "the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love."
Authority expressed by the Spirit through a community committed to maturity in Christ.



6 Comments:
thanks mike, a welcome perspective. recently john odean gave the example of why he no longer gives titles such as 'elder' at vcccm: everytime (ok, probably not every time, but merely a lot) he did it they under went some transformation from elding the flock to 'pastor police'. as he was following John Wimber's counsel and perspective that you know an elder because they are elding, the leadership is much less structured, which has its good and less better points. one of which is for interested not-yet-believers and those new at vcccm do not always know who to go to for some matters and authority can be mis-placed by their perspective of who they think has authority...and by those who think they have authority and maybe not not have as much as they think. as you said, abuses continue to take place but i think it works here for the most part because of the humility of those in leadership and the grace of the holy spirit. it also promotes the common priesthood of all believers...so all can minister while downsizing 'superstardom' and the consequences of that.
peace
I have a question because this came up (not as directly as I am saying this, but this was gist) in a group on Sunday. "If we are saved, why does maturity matter?"
becky
Mike,
Interesting post. In many ways, I find myself agreeing with you. For instance, the way the man in your group was brought back to the faith was a great example of the body reaching out in love. If that is to be considered part of the “pastoral” gift, then it certainly is a pastoral gift that the body at large is encouraged to use (James 5:19-20). The example certainly showed, “authority expressed by the Spirit through a community committed to maturity in Christ.”
It is awesome to have a body function to bring a sinner back who agrees he did something wrong. I would not want to lessen the importance of such actions. However, adultery is pretty much universally condemned, even in pro gay marriage circles. Such peer encouragement doesn’t help much in the case of divisive issues that are not accepted in a given culture. People simply find a different community that agrees with them and has a “more Biblical” approach to the topic. To address such culturally divisive issues effectively, the authority of the bishop must be respected. That is how the NT church functioned on the question of circumcision. The apostles got together to decide the doctrine and then the rest of the church got in line (primarily Jews in Jerusalem). There is a continuity between the scriptural examples and the early church history in this regard. Where there is no authority to decide doctrine, the followers of Christ quite often succumb to the pull of culture on doctrinal questions. This was evident with the Judaizers requiring circumcision for gentiles in the early church and it is evident in the dearth of teaching on remarriage in western churches today. Jesus called those who remarry adulterers. Today, Protestant Christians divorce at the same rate as the culture at large. Even if one can get some general agreement on divorce being wrong, there is no agreement on remarriage in principle. The concepts also don’t seem to affect how people live. How does one propose in the absence of identifiable church authority to solve this problem?
http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=170
http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=128
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_diov.htm
I must take exception to a couple things that seem to be implied. If I am misinterpreting you, feel free to correct me. One is that abuse of power negates the legitimacy of hierarchy in the church. The other is that hierarchy is “artificially constructed.”
Regarding the idea that hierarchy is artificially constructed, it was said that, “Within a community of faith, from time to time God needs to use an individual or a few to help the community navigate through a trial or difficult question. But it is my sincere belief that the Holy Spirit is perfectly capable of coordinating that leadership without our help.”
The problem with this is that Jesus and the apostles did not conceive that people would simply come out of the woodwork. When Jesus left, he left representatives on earth. He didn’t just leave a church body, he left an authority structure to guide that church. The apostles were given profound authority and responsibility (Luke 18:17, John 20:21 and Luke 10:16) and they passed that on to those whom they specifically appointed. They even commanded those whom they appointed to themselves appoint successors to lead the church. “You then, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus, and what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.” II Timothy 2:1-2
"Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit, to be the bishops and deacons of future believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier. . . . Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry" (Clement of Rome, Letter to the Corinthians 42:4–5, 44:1–3) (~80 AD)
Second, the lack of faith of specific leaders in either on a specific topic or in general does not negate the validity of the hierarchical institution to which the person belongs. The Old Testament is replete with examples of corruption in God’s people that did not negate the system he set up. Specifically, in the priesthood, this is evident throughout scripture from Hophni and Phinehas (I Samual 1-4) all the way through Jesus day. In Matthew 23 Jesus said, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat; so practice and observe whatever they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice." Clearly, Jesus is making the point that corruption and sinfulness of leaders does not simply invalidate their leadership role or position.
Lastly, I really appreciate your focus on the passage in Ephesians 4 on the purpose of certain spiritual gifts "the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love." I would simply like to point out the apostles’ emphasis on the unity of the faith and doctrinal stability as essential precursors to growing up into Christ the head. Jesus has gone to the Father, leaving behind the Holy Spirit and his Church to act as his body. To hear the apostles is to hear Christ. They and their successors are his official spokespeople on earth regarding doctrinal issues (Acts 15:28). Without such authority, communities struggle to ascertain God’s will regarding even the most basic questions such as when/if divorce and remarriage are ok. Without an authoritative voice to speak for God, His people end up following the culture around them.
Sorry for the long post. It’s hard to address such a broad topic in such a limited space.
Doug
Thanks for the comments again guys. Sorry I haven't been able to respond in a timely manner...I've been very busy at work lately. Not too much time for writing.
Doug, I guess from my perspective I see the example of Jesus regarding leadership and authority which in turn was handed down to the apostles as fundamentally different than what at the time was the status quo structure of leadership within the Jewish community. Again, that does not mean Jesus promoted anarchy and no one should ever be recognized as a "leader". It just appears that it was Jesus' intent for leadership to have a entirely different basis than anything that had come before - Holy Spirit initiated, centered in servanthood, and seen as another functional part of a healthy community.
As far as issues like divorce, again, I still appeal to the authority behind a community dead set on following Jesus. Within a group centered on living in God's kingdom, there is little room for people casting off lifetime commitments. Discipleship is a lifetime commitment...through thick and thin. Sure, there is still sin - and as John Wimber used to say, "Sin makes you stupid." So people do stupid things and the community lovingly (but perhaps forcefully at times) brings them back into the fold.
I'm not Catholic, so there's a measure of this that we're probably not going to see eye to eye on. It's my intent to consider some things related to leadership and giftings that would be helpful for our community and groups like ours. My primary goal is local...so I'm not trying to make once and for all statements about the church in general or how every church should be.
"As far as issues like divorce, again, I still appeal to the authority behind a community dead set on following Jesus."
I pray you are successful in implementing this. God cares deeply about families. He instituted marriage and His will regarding marriage is talked about alot in Scripture. Unfortunately, I've yet to meet an evangelical Protestant community that was any different from the culture at large regarding divorce over the long haul. On the other hand, I've yet to meet a Protestant community that actually believed Jesus when he said that remarriage is adultery. Maybe your community is different.
Good luck.
Doug
Mike, excellent points. There's a real interesting post on our blog entitled 'spirit of anti-christ', showing the difference between positional authority as opposed to functional authority in the bopdy of Christ
Post a Comment
<< Home